Web
Analytics Made Easy - Statcounter
Loquacious Lew's Content - The Lotus Forums - Official Lotus Community Partner Jump to content


Loquacious Lew

Basic Account
  • Posts

    249
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Loquacious Lew

  1. They don’t need any more excitement around the Emira here.   An order placed today won’t reasonably be delivered for two years as we won’t be getting cars in numbers to satisfy orders for at least that long.  This assumes that orders so far In place aren’t pulled by impatient buyers but the surplus of demand over supply is so strong that it is even raising used prices on Evoras here as people who never considered Lotus are suddenly salivating all over the marque.  But of course the vast bulk of the heat is directed at Emira.  
     

    Even so, an unbalanced supply/demand situation can also be extremely difficult if not dangerous for a manufacturer as more time passes.  I could explain this further but the reasons why being unable to supply the market with enough product is unhealthy are self evident.   
     

    The “big brass” tours currently underway here have been very well received overall but they seem more goodwill hunting than necessary sales events. We simply won’t get enough cars fast enough to meet what seems to be a very strong tide of demand.  

    There is no way to compare owning a Lotus here to owning one on your fair islands.  We have many fewer trusted dealers and service and parts support, however good or bad you think it is in GB, is woefully inadequate for the USA.  Even so, demand for Emira is surely something Lotus has never experienced here, or at least hasn’t had since the first Elise sales in 2005.  I’m waiting to order mine until I can determine what the development arc of this car might be but if I was on the list, I’d stay there for now.  However Lotus must surely be aware that not all pre orders will remain on the books if delivery time remain as they are.  

  2. I've had such a good experience with the V6 manual in my 400 that it's the spec I would opt for in an Emira.  I'm keeping my 400 regardless but I'll be watching this space and awaiting further developments as it's taking every shred of will power I have to stay off the list.  I have my reasons for wanting to be patient.  

     My Evora is representative of the first of the 4XX cars shipped over here. It's been so satisfying to drive, it's set up to my liking, I  trust it, I like seeing it in my garage, I own it, so it's a keeper.  The benefit of thinking like this is that it  allows me to be patient as the new car's arc is revealed.  I'd like this one to represent peak Emira. If history is any guide,  patience will be required for my spec to be announced.  

    .  

    • Like 2
  3. 6 hours ago, Likuid said:

    This is kind of where I am at and probably somewhat had to do with my initial disappointment in the Emira. To me the move from my 400 to the Emira feels like a more horizontal move, based on the current performance numbers we have been given. I might drive me 400 1 or 2 days a week during the driving time of year. For 4 or 5 months of the year it sits because of winter. So while the tech and improved looks are very nice, its still hard to justify right now without also seeing a performance jump. I am sure they will get there eventually with the Emira and maybe that day is the day I put in my order.

     

     

    That's me.  I want to know more about the development arc planned for the Emira.   I'm looking for the one without the power seats!  I want the tech though and it's gorgeous.    Brilliant if they can keep it aspirational.  It's exciting, can't wait to see a real one.  .  

  4. On 20/06/2021 at 13:29, Cdm2018 said:

    I watch a load of u tube videos on the Evora some of the US are actually affiliated to a driver car ethos but many of the reviews both private owners or dealers and some u tube versions of US car mags tend to focus on how the car does its 0-60mph times and overall horsepower of the car. 
    I guess US culture is still weighted towards the quarter mile drag times in between the lights as a measure of a car.

    Some of reviews focus on the handling capabilities but I don’t they truly connect with how car feels on the twisters as the US folk refer    

    Matt Farah is one of my favorite reviewers and his 400 and GT reviews are almost perfect from an owner's point of view.  He shows what is for a reviewer, a complete understanding of the details.  

     

    I have been planning to keep my Evora but may place an order for an Emira depending on how impatient I am.  I would prefer to monitor the arc of development and buy the "430" version of the Emira assuming there is one but the car is compelling to me as is.  The AMG is not my preferred option, at least not as presented so far.

    • Like 2
  5. I'm all for it and for Lotus to make the splash with this car they have been unable to do in the past.  I thought the JB tie in suggested a new capability to promote the cars. Lotus deserves to succeed, Carr and his team did a bang up job and no doubt the engineering teams worked their hearts out to make it drive like a Lotus.   I want one .  

     I just hope they don't forget those of  us who bought new cars from them when things weren't looking so rosy.  Evora parts availability in the USA is discouraging.  I would like to keep my Evora as well as acquire an Emira.  I hope that isn't too hard to do.  There's big excitement about the Emira over here, including my own interest, but service and dealer access must rise to equal the product.  

     

  6. The lack of even a mention of the 400 as the base car the later cars  are all built upon tells us  how little attention Motor Trend has paid to what has  been the progress of the Evora.  In my opinion, they are the least connected US magazine to enthusiast vehicles and values.    Their (too) belated recognition of the Evora as a viable option is typical of their focus on American style performance to the exclusion of the feel and emotion cars like the Evora command.  .  

  7. Used Evora prices are stable  here.  '17 400s are  sold at high $60Ks to $75K  while '18s go for a little more although milage, equipment  and condition are more important than vintage for 400s.  But for the time being it seems like Evora prices are at a bottom.   Now, for better or worse the used  Evora population is so small that demand has started to meet or possibly even exceed supply. I get the impression that the Evora has finally made a dent in American car consciousness.  I think Lotus sales were up near 40% last year.  We know that's not really all that many cars but as a relative metric it's excellent and I would think encouraging to Lotus.    Of course, the new cars can only be Evoras here and they are the most expensive Evora ever at that.  That tends to drive the used market up a bit.  

    We're still Porsche and Corvette besotted but there are recently a few more people buying new GTs. First time buyers are notably present.  Of course specialist interest and prices for Elise and Exige remain high.   I think it would take a special Exige to go for 70K though and no Elise I am aware of has sold that high but 400s do.  Nobody wants to sell one for $65,000 so you just don't see them priced there.    GTs naturally cost more than any other modern road going Lotus here and are likely to stay that way but the real story for resale only gets told when Evoras are discontinued.  Evora's relative depreciation is good in the states but they are still depreciating from new of course.  Still, I drive mine a lot and don't expect those miles to be all that costly at this point in the car's life cycle.   

    As a rough guide older NAs are 30-40+K and S cars can go as high up to $60K for unique or special cars.  At this point, you could say 400s cost 70K and up with a top at maybe $75K.  There are always exceptions of course.  I think the Evora has a bit more future here than it did  18 months ago as people speculate about what replaces it.  

     

    • Like 1
  8. 10 hours ago, andydclements said:

    I'm currently laughing at the fact that his banks are now pulling the rug from beneath his empire, and I very much doubt that other big players will be keen to support in their place (even if they secretly support or were simply comfortable to provide the banking) they'll probably choose to avoid the bad publicity and loss of other business that would follow.

    This is just the beginning disappointment  for him. The Proud Boys were expecting a bunker scene wherein he and Melanoma poison the dog and take considerably  more dramatic steps rather than grudgingly consent to the communist victory. But they didn't get that.  He just flew off to Mara Lago....that's the bunker for now..... to lick his wounds. He's going to  have  a rough few months and I think it will get worse before it gets better for him. Even the city of Mara Lago is fighting his presence.  It sucks to be him today. 

     It's only fair. I can see him with a future on  drive time radio and of course  another reality TV show but as was mentioned, the RE business just got a lot tougher for him. And then there will be the courts.  You will want to watch the Senate proceedings but if you don't, I will try to report them with my completely unbiased eye from here.  I hope the trial doesn't drag on for a lot of reasons.  Finally, it should not go unmentioned that  Rupert has blood on his hands too but they make a pair so a media future is in the offing.  Trump's always been Rupert's boy.    He was useful.  

    Better though,  things are looking up and that is so nice.  Biden has a very difficult road ahead but today was a tonic.   

     

    Speaking of roads, related automotive content: 

     

     

    • Like 2
  9. 15 hours ago, Techyd said:

    I thought the 'buck' of responsibility stops with the president, if it's possible to pardon yourself then where does that responsibility go?  It can't be God!

    It isn't good and no man should have such unrestricted power.  I wonder if that will ever be addressed.  That's a constitutional power which means it would require an amendment to alter the scope of the thing.  Nobody expects The Spanish Inquisition....or such a feckless and corrupted president. Big wake up call.  

    • Like 2
  10.  

    5 hours ago, andydclements said:

    I think that description is fair, but I don't think he would have been in any position to state facts to support the various cases, since to date nobody seems to have found any materially relevant cases of fraud (not say there was any , not saying there was none, just that if a few were found in each state it really isn't going to alter the result).

    I now cannot think of Trump without thinking of  a mix of Gollum and this (apologies to US members who may not be familiar with this series of films aka movies).

     

     

    Not only did I see the movie, I read the books and can sing along with the anthem.  

     

     

  11. 5 hours ago, top-plumber said:

    Take another look. Wasn’t my post smart arse... 🖕

    apology accepted...

    Sorry about that.  It sounded just like you and from here it's hard to see much difference.   Please forward my message to Barry if you'd be so kind as he said he won't be making any more contributions here.  I'll be just as pleased to be corrected about Mandela from him if he can find some evidence.    Now go back to your moaning chair, have a  seat by the fire and a nice hot cuppa.  With my ever so sincere apology  of course. 

  12. 20 hours ago, EldonZ said:

    One thing that most do not understand correctly, impeachment is not the end of the process but the beginning. We have had other Presidents impeached but not found guilty by the Senate. Either the President resigned or the Senate did not convict.

    As long as the impeachment is approved by the House before the President leave office, he can still be convicted after his term is up. He cannot be removed from office but he can be stopped from running or holding another federally elected position.

    Later,
    Eldon

     

    I believe he can be kept from office if he is convicted in the Senate, where the trial is actually heard.  The impeachment (as I understand it) is the formal declaration and levying of the charges.  I'm unclear if that alone keeps him from running for office in the future.  Open to correction as always, of course.  

  13. 21 hours ago, 100th_Idiot said:

    By the time this gets to the Senate it will be controlled by the Democrats so the chances of succesful impeachment rise.

    That's true in that the Senate Majority Leader (Chuck Schumer) will be in charge of the procedures but unfortunately, the Senate requires a 2/3 vote to convict.  A simple majority won't do.  If that were the case (simple majority) there would be no question that he would be convicted.  Since the Senate is split 50/50,  the Republican party will be required to provide 17 votes to convict.  Are there 17 honest Republicans in the Senate who will openly consider the evidence and actions that lead up to the riots and sedition in Washington?  That's far from clear.   

     

    Hey plumber, ever find any proof of Mandela being a murderer?  I remain open to such if you have it.  If you don't, your last contribution to this thread is received  as good news and an indication that Mandela isn't the monster you have made him out to be.  

  14. 1 hour ago, EldonZ said:

    Impeachment has no teeth, it's like being indited for a crime and a trial is held. Only if the Senate convicts him are there any repercussions. If he is convicted in the Senate then he will not be able to hold any federal elected government office. I'm not sure about state offices.

    The big debate is if he self pardons himself, it sets up the legal challenge if a self-pardon is constitutionally legal. Also, if a person that is pardoned excepts the pardon, they are admitting guilt. This also requires that the person then answer all questions asked surrounding the pardon. If they do not, they are then guilty, again, of obstruction.

    Later,
    Eldon

    Eldon's post gets it  correctly.  Neal's question is answered in Eldon's post, but to address it clearly, the law regarding the value of presidential self pardons  is untested or at least unclear as to what protection Trump obtains  if he pardons himself.  So that remains to be seen. As mentioned, anyone receiving a pardon is obliged to answer all questions pertaining to the issues and connected issues without the protection of the fifth amendment.  The penalties for lying in this way are severe.  However, if someone other than the president himself is pardoned for a specific crime, it really doesn't matter what corroborating evidence is uncovered.  A presidential pardon is essentially absolute.   One presumes the same would hold true if his self pardon was judged as legally binding.  He would escape the consequences regardless of any crime regardless of its severity.  He would still be liable for crimes committed before he was president, and he would still be open to actions against him by the states.  But he would be immune from prosecution by Federal authorities.  Barr's justice department (Well, Trump's actually) interpreted the law to be that Trump could not be charged in court while he was still president. This meant that he was immune from the usual liabilities that any citizen would face during his term as president.  That time is soon to pass,  and he becomes liable for all of it.  They say he's considering the broadest range of pardons ever to include family and friends, and himself. This huge blanket of pardons, should it be attempted by Trump will surely be tested in court but as mentioned, where it ends is unclear.  However, the presidential power to pardon is extremely broad, almost unlimited really, so how it will all turn out is an interesting question. 

     

     

    • Like 2
  15. ^I had a dense aunt.  She's not with us anymore and even though I, my sister and all my cousins weren't fond of her, the funeral was very sad.  I found out that we all really wanted to like her but each had trouble with her in different ways.  Even her kids felt that way.  That was something I didn't know until we all talked about it.  I thought I was the only one that had a problem with her.  But as I said, she was thick and never  got the point  and always argued about the littlest things.  Like   just picking at the turnips in the margins of the plate instead of digging into the roast.  But I digress.

     

    Mandela is more complicated.  He had to struggle under apartheid., a legal, organized system of oppression. Mandela and de Klerk of course shared the Novel Peace Prize, which gives him some street cred, I'd  think. 

    Meanwhile, Mandela was in prison. But, removed from the fight on the ground, Mandela ended up having a massive impact on the fight for anti-apartheid justice in South Africa — and, especially as anti-apartheid sentiments spread around the world, global opinion of him shifted dramatically.“He comes out of jail an old man, much more ready to compromise after almost 30 years in jail,” argues Peniel Joseph, Founding Director Center for the Study of Race and Democracy at the University of Texas at Austin. “When he comes out, he’s saying we’re renouncing violence.”

     

    I can forgive a person who renounces violence and works for peaceful resolution but I'm not sure what there is to forgive Mandela for   given the brutality of apartheid. He himself said many times that he was far from perfect and I've no doubt that's true. I hope he was able to forgive himself.  My forgiveness doesn't matter anymore if it ever did. Neither does yours, actually!     I understand Gandhi and King had their own issues.  I forgive them too!

    Apartheid really was a nasty business and made for nasty business from the oppressed as well as the oppressor.  That kind of situation always does.  It ruins the victims and the masters alike.  Now, I don't see where he has  been accused of murder or been convicted for it.  Perhaps I missed that and you can provide me with a link to the conviction.   I'd be abashed about that but Mandela is a good example of change I can applaud.  Maybe you would have preferred Desmond Tutu.  He's less controversial, so edit my list. I don't mind and I don't need be right about Mandela to be right elsewhere and for you to be wrong about everything else.

     

    But we're just talking and laughing, right?  :) 

     

    *This post has been edited and here is the final edit.  I just got my fifth dot!  I gained two dots almost entirely due to this thread!  I am proud to be a more dotted member here!  Thank you admin, or algorithm or whoever.    

    **What do we call them, actually?  Dots?  Points? Globules?  I assume they monitor activity?  Or am I now a commissioned officer? Anyway, I have five of them now.  I feel like I belong.    

     

     

     

     

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience, serve personalized ads or content, and analyze our traffic. By clicking " I Accept ", you consent to our use of cookies. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.