<embed src="http://www.evo.co.uk/front_website/swf_library/jw/4.5/player-4.5.swf" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" flashvars="file=http://video.evo.co.uk/online/LotusElise_APR2010.flv&plugins=dcinstream,gapro-1&dcinstream.ad.tag=http://ad.doubleclick.net/pfadx/www.evo.co.uk/videos/planetevovideos;tile=9;bigad=yes;live=yes;type=article;make=lotus;model=elise;sz=468x430;ord=8575171209?&dcinstream.ad.position=pre&gapro.accountid=UA-4196494-1&gapro.trackpercentage=true&gapro.tracktime=true&gapro.trackcompletes=true&gapro.trackdetails=true&gapro.trackerror=true&autostart=true" width="392" height="239" />

<br><br>Henry Catchpole road tests the latest Lotus Elise roadster on evo TV

Looked like Newlands Corner. Car looks excellent, I now want one.

Trevor.

Arh , finally got to see it, had to go for a shower, then eat a meal over the mall, just so it had enough buffer in the clip to watch it :lol

Dam hotel internet

Good review init

Edited May 11, 201015 yr by Dodgy

Good review all in all.

Love the colour but then i would say that

But they should have given him the "R" Not the entry level version

Who cares about Fuel economy, When the tank gets low i simply fill it up again

Same performance, more refinement, cheaper to run. Very nice. I want one.

500 miles to a tank!

Autocar don't give quite such a glowing report: Clicky

4 Living:

it’s no surprise that it looks dated and, more seriously, well adrift of the standards of quality, fit and finish that you’ll find in cars costing under £10,000 these days.

5. Verdict:

But this Lotus is old and expensive — £11,000 more than a base Mazda MX-5. It’s also poorly equipped, with a standard of finish that was a history lesson even at the point of its 2001-model-year interior makeover.