Yep, that just about encapsulates it as far as I am concerned.
As others have already said, it work both ways. To my mind half the problem these days is that most, if not all, the recreational representative bodies' agendas have become far too political and divisive. As a result we've seen long estabished organisations such as the Cyclists' Touring Club preaching the anti-motorist mantra to its members; a very vociferous campaign by the Ramblers Association resulted in some 80% of 'green' lanes and byways being closed to off road drivers and riders. The latter organisation has also managed to alienate huge numbers of farmers and land owners as a result of its championing the Right To Roam bill.
I was a member of both organisations for many years and was saddened to see them gradually change from being friendly, pro cycling/walking bodies to divisive anti-everything-else pressure groups. Unfortunately, they're all too reflective of the collective mentality of today's society.
Anyway, I'm sure it's that sort of 'brainwashing' that has resulted in some cyclists becoming so anti-motorist. Fortunately, they are still very much in the minority.
Donning my rural cyclist's hat for a minute, in my experience the vast majority of motorists are very considerate towards cyclists. I've certainly never encountered overt aggression, but have had my arm brushed by the odd driver who's a bit lacking in the spatial skills department.
Equally, as a motorist/pedestrian, I've encountered some pretty appalling cyclists, particularly in London.
If you want a subject that really gets me hot under the collar try bloody caravans, oh and horseboxes