Is it just me?.......

[ramjet]

Hi,

I thought this might simply have been something on my MAC after Firefox updated a short while back. MAC running OS10.6.6 with Firefox 3.6.13. If I click an external link in a post, a new tab opens and begins to download the link, but the original tab with the thread also loads the external link page. I have just put up with it and after going back to the original tab clicking back twice gets me back the forum thread and then back to the new content page.

I say I though it might have been just my MAC here, but when I logged on from work yesterday (Windows with IE V something) I got the same thing happening there with an external link which sort of indicates it's the forum software?

Any ideas anyone?

Thanks,

Michael.

[fmxa]

Ditto here

[Moxie]

Ditto. Snow Leopard 10.6.6 and Firefox 3.6.13. Weird.

[oneshot]

Yep

Happens to me no matter what browser or machine.

[lrg_machine]

Yep! Same on chrome

[Mark Blanchard]

And me. Slightly annoying but not the end of the world.

[Bibs]

This has ben happening since I updated to 3.1.4 and I logged the issue with a support ticket last week. Its not right and theres an issue with the last upgrade that caused it but we're already on the case and it will be resolved soon

[ramjet]

Well done Bibs. Another one if you haven't already noticed/seen it. Sometimes when I click reload to refresh the view new content page, firefox asks me if I want to save index.php as a file. Clicking reload again loads the view new content page normally.

[Iconic Ride]

Turn your screen the right way up, you antipodean fool! Aren't Oz macs shipped with gravity boots?

[dodgy]

Any news on the fix Bibbo

[Bibs]

No, they can't fix it up it's been upgraded from a support ticket to bug report.

You can track the topic yourself here.

http://community.invisionpower.com/tracker/issue-27370-links/

[lotus4s]

Looks like a real popular place over there with all the responses you've gotten....

[Petrol feet driven]

After looking on the forums I found this about URLs in navigation, any help?

In API XML-RPC logs there are incorrect URLs in navigation section at the bottom of the page. When there is more than one subpage of logs results the URL to e.g. second page is:

h**p://board.com/admin/index.php?adsess=xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx&app=core&&module=tools&section=api&st=50

but should be:

h**p://board.com/admin/index.php?adsess=xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx&app=core&&module=tools&section=api&do=log_list&st=50

h**p = http

Edited February 11, 2011 by Petrol feet driven

[USAndretti42]

Why didn't I think of that?

[Tony K]

Why didn't I think of that?

Indeed! Why, Dave, I think you've got it!

[wookiecj]

Indeed! Why, Dave, I think you've got it!

one plus one equals ten... first law of Boolean Sod!

[Petrol feet driven]

I think your find that's false in Boolean version 1,6 but in recent versions of Python, 2.4 and above now Boolean has made that to be true. Thanks to Java script..

[dodgy]

Wow

[USAndretti42]

They do say there are only 10 types of people in the world. Those who understand binary and those who don't .

[Petrol feet driven]

I was only joking its not true, what in Boolean is '0' what is true but false.

Still no replys Bibs?

[wookiecj]

Are we getting into the realms of OOP 'chicken instances' and 'road instances' with hereditary properties causing inbreeding here?

[Iconic Ride]

It's all so elementary. If you call up "calculator" on your machine, and ask it to divide Fermat's last theorem ["Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadrato-quadratum in duos quadrato-quadratos, et generaliter nullam in infinitum ultra quadratum potestatem in duos eiusdem nominis fas est dividere cuius rei demonstrationem mirabilem sane detexi. Hanc marginis exiguitas non caperet"] * by the square root of negative one, the superfluous link becomes "imaginary," and migrates to its respective alternative universe. Problem solved.

*If you can't translate from the Latin, you don't belong on this thread.

[Bibs]

Or you could use the back button.

[ramjet]

[Petrol feet driven]

"It is impossible for a cube to be the sum of two cubes, a fourth power to be the sum of two fourth powers, or in general for any number that is a power greater than the second to be the sum of two like powers. I have discovered a truly marvelous demonstration of this proposition that this margin is too narrow to contain."

Easy..

Now I will leave this thread..