Web
Analytics Made Easy - Statcounter
100th_Idiot's Content - Page 13 - TLF - Totally Lotus Jump to content


100th_Idiot

Full Forum Member (FFM)
  • Posts

    761
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Everything posted by 100th_Idiot

  1. Yup. First in many years that made me laugh. Enjoyed tonight's episode. Welcome back
  2. Yes. Just like making an error of taking one to many steps after a 5 mile walk to a cliff edge. How bad could it be?
  3. Sort of. I think we are having discussions but formally we are not allowed to negotiate or sign a deal until we leave the EU. Depending on the deal we leave with we may or may not be able to negotiate independent trade arrangements. Depends what the dela is.
  4. I don't think Japan and Singapore deals are under WTO. They are separate trade deals. There are 168 I think signatories to WTO and under that you cannot differentiate import tariffs between countries. You are free under WTO to negotiate independent trade deals but we all know that can take several years.
  5. Your tariffs under WTO must be the same for everyone with which you trade under WTO rules. Since we don't have a trade deal with either the U.S. or China at the moment WTO tariffs would apply. We can only set import tarrifs. No obligation for countries to reciprocate so our exports would be unchanged
  6. The EU were always going to negotiate in their interest and make it very difficult for the UK to make an example to others. That was obvious before the referendum. On WTO tariffs if we set zero for the EU we have to set zero for everyone. You cannot discriminate. So zero for the EU also means zero for the U.S. and zero for China.
  7. Watch Bad Santa. That's all I'm saying.
  8. They can still wait for you to get out of your car and prevent it from locking while you go wherever you are going.
  9. Don't knock the Ford transit key when all these high end motors with keyless entry are getting stolen at will. I'll keep the key thanks .
  10. Sorry. There is an example of unnecessary antagonism. Yes it happens on both sides but it has no place in a civilised debate.
  11. I don't really agree. They get it alright. This is how they earn their living by interpreting and manipulating votes. It's just that they don't WANT to get it.
  12. Can't help the fact its a pisser. See if the vendor will make a contribution then never go near them again. Bon Chance.
  13. Not great. Black wrap or vinyl over the back would hide it.
  14. No. Breakfast meet at the Departure Lounge Cafe, Alton south of Basingstoke. Started off 3 or 4 years ago with a handful of Alfas and has grown to around 150 vehicles.
  15. Infiltrating an Italian car meet and ogling some nice motors.
  16. A little more complicated. 5G new radio bands are in 3.8 to 6GHz. Commonly known as sub 6GHz and greater than 28GHz. There are 38 or so existing radio bands ranging from 800MHz to 2.8GHz for 2,3 and 4G. Nothing prevents 5G being deployed in those as well. WiFi and Bluetooth also 2.4Ghz. Some LTEis 2.3GHz.
  17. Make 40 separate trips. Simple.
  18. There has been lots of debate over many years. And you were quite right not to climb a radar tower. It would cook you. It's all about output power and proximity to the body. Handsets have much lower power as they are against the body. Base stations aren't against the body and have much higher output power which degrades with distance (weak signals anyone?). It's been studied for years and years.
  19. That reads like an anti vaxxer site without any specific detail. At its simplest 5G is just a new protocol on 4G radio frequencies and its the RF that's important. The new radio frequencies are in two blocks. Sub 6GHz similar to some wifi and microwave in the 30GHz range. Confusingly your domestic microwave is in the 2.4GHz range along with original wifi and Bluetooth. Both deployed worldwide with no appreciable rise in brain tumours etc. Then you get to output power where there are very strict limits on what can radiated close to the body vs from a base station conveniently glossed over by the article. I am more than happy to read through and give airtime to objective scientific debate but that site doesn't pass the sniff test.
  20. 🤔 The icing is the best bit
  21. Well. That confuses network planning with the actual mobile phone. Blame your carrier for lack of coverage.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience, serve personalized ads or content, and analyze our traffic. By clicking " I Accept ", you consent to our use of cookies. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.